
The whole time I was reading The Waves I kept thinking, I would enjoy this more if I listened to it. I think The Waves might be better as an audiobook, not that I listen to a lot of audiobooks. Actually, I've only listened to one, just to see if I'd like them. It was Pride and Prejudice and I'd already read it, so I knew what was going to happen. The flow of The Waves, the lyricism of the words, made me feel as though I would enjoy listening to it. The characters, never speak to each other, they only speak to you.
I knew - sort of - what was going to happen in The Waves. This was my second reading, but as I mentioned in a previous post, I didn't really remember it. I wondered why. Now I know. Nothing happens. As I said, we are so much in the heads of the characters, that we don't really experience them doing anything, I don't feel like there is really a plot to engage with. They all just live their lives and have feelings about them.
The Waves is called Virginia Woolf's most experimental piece of fiction. I can see why it would be called such. I have read many of Woolf's novels. Though To The Lighthouse and Mrs. Dalloway are "stream of consciousness", they are not like The Waves. The Waves exists almost on its own.

Though we stay inside the character's minds through the book, they each have a distinct voice. I could tell which character I was with, just based on the way they spoke (soliloquized) and what they were talking about. They each had their own wants, worries, and opinions. I found it fitting that the novel ended with Bernard. He was the storyteller. He was always searching for words. Through him, I think the reader learns the most about what is happening in the lives of the characters.

* I'm not sure about the spoiler warning. I mean, it's a classic Virginia Woolf book and I'm pretty sure Percival's death is in the synopsis on some editions.
On a side note, I recently came across a post on The Guardian's book blog all about Virginia Woolf, her work and her death. Honestly, I know how Woolf died, but I don't typically think about that when I read her work. It's an interesting post.
Also, 20/60 for my classics list.