Apparently, this is part of M.R. James’ style; he was the creator of the “antiquarian ghost story”. He used more realistic settings and stayed away from the Gothic. He wrote during the early twentieth century and his ghost stories are thought to be some of the best in English Literature. If this is the case, I wonder which or whether any current horror writers have read him.
I’m not sure what I thought of the story itself. Two Doctors was definitely interesting. Did I enjoy it? I don’t know. Maybe I’m too tired these days to be reading something written in such a dense style. Initially I was confused. The story is only eight of the pages in my Oxford Book of English Short Stories, but I found that I kept having to go back and re-read a paragraph or two that I just finished, so I would know what was going on. I didn’t dislike the story. It just left me feeling ambivalent towards it. I think it’s one of those stories I’m likely to forget in a few weeks.
Thanks to John Mutford at The Book Mine Set for hosting Short Story Monday.
When your initials looked like "Mister," you'd think you'd choose your full first name.
ReplyDeleteThough you didn't seem to enjoy it, I'm curious about what the heck an "antiquarian ghost story" is. I've bookmarked it to read in October, closer to Halloween, but I have a strong feeling I won't be scared.
From what I read after reading the story, James was trying to distance himself from Gothic horror, like Frankenstein and Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde. He seemed to be trying to make the supernatural a question instead of a fact of the plot. It was not scary.
ReplyDeleteM.R. stands for Montague Rhodes; maybe that was too much of a mouth full?
I haven't heard of M.R. James or antiquarian ghost stories, but am definitely intrigued! I'd like to read this in October...
ReplyDelete